New in version 2016.11.0.
Salt can manage state against explicitly defined state, for example if your minion state is defined by:
/etc/config_file: file.managed: - source: salt://configs/myconfig
If someone modifies this file, the next application of the highstate will allow the admin to correct this deviation and the file will be corrected.
Now, what happens if somebody creates a file
/etc/important_config_file? Unless you have a explicit rule, this
change will go unnoticed.
The snapper state module allows you to manage state implicitly, in addition to explicit rules, in order to define a baseline and iterate with explicit rules as they show that they work in production.
The workflow is: once you have a working and audited system, you would create
your baseline snapshot (eg. with
salt tgt snapper.create_snapshot) and
define in your state this baseline using the identifier of the snapshot
(in this case: 20):
my_baseline: snapper.baseline_snapshot: - number: 20 - include_diff: False - ignore: - /var/log - /var/cache
Baseline snapshots can be also referenced by tag. Most recent baseline snapshot is used in case of multiple snapshots with the same tag:
- tag: my_custom_baseline_tag
- config: external
- ignore: - /mnt/tmp_files/
If you have this state, and you haven't done changes to the system since the
snapshot, and you add a user, the state will show you the changes (including
full diffs) to
/etc/shadow, etc if you call it
test=True and will undo all changes if you call it without.
This allows you to add more explicit state knowing that you are starting from a very well defined state, and that you can audit any change that is not part of your explicit configuration.
So after you made this your state, you decided to introduce a change in your configuration:
my_baseline: snapper.baseline_snapshot: - number: 20 - ignore: - /var/log - /var/cache hosts_entry: file.blockreplace: - name: /etc/hosts - content: 'First line of content' - append_if_not_found: True
The change in
/etc/hosts will be done after any other change that deviates
from the specified snapshot are reverted. This could be for example,
modifications to the
/etc/passwd file or changes in the
that could render your the
hosts_entry rule void or dangerous.
Once you take a new snapshot and you update the baseline snapshot number to
include the change in
hosts_entry rule will basically
do nothing. You are free to leave it there for documentation, to ensure that
the change is made in case the snapshot is wrong, but if you remove anything
that comes after the
snapper.baseline_snapshot as it will have no effect;
by the moment the state is evaluated, the baseline state was already applied
and include this change.
Make sure you specify the baseline state before other rules, otherwise the baseline state will revert all changes if they are not present in the snapshot.
Do not specify more than one baseline rule as only the last one will affect the result.
|codeauthor:||Duncan Mac-Vicar P. <email@example.com>|
|codeauthor:||Pablo Suárez Hernández <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
baseline_snapshot(name, number=None, tag=None, include_diff=True, config=u'root', ignore=None)¶
Enforces that no file is modified comparing against a previously defined snapshot identified by number.